Prosecuting Domestic Terrorists
Prosecuting Domestic Terrorists
- Thursday, February 20
- 7 to 8:30 p.m.
- Museum Auditorium
![Mary McCord of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy speaks onstage during a public program at the Museum Auditorium. McCord is sitting with her legs crossed as she gestures with her left hand and looks out at the audience. To her right is Seamus Hughes of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism. He is listening with his legs crossed. To the left of McCord is the moderator. She is holding a clipboard.](/sites/default/files/paragraph/hero-banner/2020-03/MG_PPGTHURS0220_015_heade.jpg)
In 2019, high profile attacks in El Paso, Texas, and Gilroy, California, raised questions about how these killers are prosecuted. Despite the public perception that attacks like El Paso and Gilroy are acts of domestic terrorism, “domestic terrorism” is not a formal federal crime. Mary McCord of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and Seamus Hughes of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism discuss what constitutes “domestic terrorism” and the challenges in prosecuting it.
Photos
Videos
Prosecuting Domestic Terrorists Full Program
Videos
-
2020_0220_Prosecuting Domestic Terrorists_Highlight-1_(Caps)HIGHLIGHT CLIP
-
2020_0220_Prosecuting Domestic Terrorists_Highlight-2_(Caps)HIGHLIGHT CLIP
Other Resources
- Transcript
- Blog Post: "Q&A with Mary McCord: What Everyone Needs to Know About Prosecuting Domestic Terrorism"
Through the second annual 9/11 Memorial & Museum Summit on Security, presented by Fiserv, public programs in 2020 are made possible by the Anheuser-Busch Foundation, Craig Newmark, founder, craigslist & Craig Newmark Philanthropies, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Lockheed Martin Corporation, SOS Security, and Verizon.